Guarantee Trap + Suspected Asset Stripping
Case Summary
The client was asked to provide a personal joint and several guarantee for a transaction between companies. The contract was drafted by the counterparty and the client was pressured to sign quickly, doing so without independent legal review. The counterparty company later filed for bankruptcy, and the client had reason to believe assets had been transferred beforehand. As guarantor, the client was pursued for repayment.
Timeline
The counterparty company proposed a partnership and asked the client to personally provide a joint and several guarantee for an inter-company transaction.
The contract was drafted by the counterparty's in-house legal team, who pressured the client to sign the same day. The client signed without having it reviewed by independent counsel.
The client discovered the contract contained clauses extremely unfavorable to them, including a waiver of the right to demand exhaustion of remedies against the primary debtor first.
The counterparty company ran into financial difficulty and began falling behind on payments.
The counterparty company filed for bankruptcy. The client had reason to believe substantial assets had been transferred to related parties before the filing.
Creditors pursued the client for repayment under the guarantee agreement.
While defending against the claim, the client pursued legal remedies regarding the suspected asset transfers.
The case is still in progress. The client is pursuing their rights through legal channels.
Red Flags Involved
Lessons Learned
Had a similar experience?
Your experience can help others. All submissions are strictly anonymized.
Share Your Story